Sender Policy Framework

<freeside>  so, they are unhappy about three things
<Julian>    "they" = Microsoft?
<csm>       who is *THEY*?
          * grumpy suspects one of Meng's messages got dropped.
<freeside>  microsoft!
...
<freeside>  3) zone cuts
...
<freeside>  i think we should take out zone cuts.
...
<Julian>    Re (3) (zone cut), I have already declared that I'd be ok with
            dropping it and declaring that DNS server admins should use macro
            tools or something like that.
<grumpy>    I've been saying that I would consider dropping it since last Dec.
<freeside>  okie doke
<grumpy>    It appears to be the most controversial part of the draft.
<grumpy>    zone cuts solve some problems, and causes others.
...
<csm>       the area I *hear* about... that concerns me most... is the zone
            cuts
<csm>       it seems to me that causes problems for more than Mickey from
            Redmond
<grumpy>    ok, is there anyone who is going to complain if I remove zone cuts?
<csm>       not me
<grumpy>    ok, they will be gone in the next release.
...
<Julian>    grumpy: Wait. Can we have a formal resolution for that? Just so
            that there are no complaints afterwards?
<grumpy>    motion:  drop zone cut language from the spf-classic I-D
<grumpy>    seconds?
<csm>       second
<grumpy>    22:59u: yes
<Julian>    2259u: yes
<MarkK>     2259u: yes
<freeside>  2259u: yes
<csm>       so ordered