Home | Sitemap | Recent Changes | Login

SPF Logo

Sender Policy Framework

History of Community/Lost-in-space


Revision 12 . . 2011-08-12 3:49 (UTC) by Frank Ellermann [not more completely lost in space]
Revision 11 . . 2011-08-06 22:31 (UTC) by xyzzy [*FSU study (Sanchez, Duan, Dong)]
Revision 10 . . 2011-07-28 10:23 (UTC) by xyzzy [*Google scholar alerts found a book]
Revision 9 . . (edit) 2011-05-31 8:31 (UTC) by xyzzy [typo]
Revision 8 . . 2011-05-31 8:15 (UTC) by xyzzy [Paper by M. Tariq Banday with many good references]
Revision 7 . . 2011-04-14 21:18 (UTC) by xyzzy [Implications of Netalyzr’s DNS Measurements]
Revision 6 . . 2011-03-13 4:02 (UTC) by xyzzy [*DNS Measurement Factory Survey (2010-10)]
Revision 5 . . 2011-03-07 19:31 (UTC) by xyzzy [*IIJ study]
Revision 4 . . 2011-03-06 3:55 (UTC) by xyzzy [*note for research page]
Revision 3 . . 2011-03-06 3:54 (UTC) by xyzzy
Revision 2 . . 2011-01-28 21:14 (UTC) by Frank [parked GMail help link here unti I get a fresh password]
Revision 1 . . 2011-01-28 8:59 (UTC) by Frank [alive and kicking]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)
Paragraph 1Paragraph 1

Are many (all ?) v2.listbox mailing lists gone? Or do they block gmail? So far my attempts to read the announce - council - webmasters lists failed, and new subscriptions also failed. The real problem: I lost my password for this wiki, and the procedure to ask on the webmasters list for help does not work without a webmasters list... ;-)

The SPF "webmasters" list allegedly does not more exist, use the "help" or "discuss" lists to resolve any OpenSPF wiki write access issues.



Notes for later:

[[http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=180707|GMail about SPF and DKIM]] (2011)

Note for later, everything else meanwhile copied to the [[Research|SPF research]] page (2010 and 2011): [[http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=180707|GMail about SPF and DKIM]]


[[http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/research.google.com/en/us/pubs/archive/36954.pdf|Google Research: The war against spam]] (2011, PDF)

[[http://www.iij.ad.jp/en/development/iir/pdf/iir_vol09_message.pdf|IIJ review vol. 9]] (2010, PDF): slight decrease in SPF deployment, but 4.4% FAIL

[[http://dns.measurement-factory.com/surveys/201010/dns_survey_2010.pdf|DNS Survey]] (2010, PDF): 66% EDNS0, 16% SPF, 0.01% SenderID, 2.5% DKIM 

[[http://conferences.npl.co.uk/satin/papers/satin2011-Weaver.pdf|Netalyzr]] (2011, PDF): Many DNS observations relevant not only for SPF

[[http://airccse.org/journal/ijdps/papers/0511ijdps04.pdf|Effectiveness and limitations of e-mail security protocols]] (2011, PDF): Covers SPF, SenderID, DKIM, and S/MIME

[[http://www.springerlink.com/content/g7328498n0482458/ DNS and Bind 10]] (2011, Springer)

[http://www.cs.fsu.edu/~duan/publications/2011_ceas.pdf Blocking Spam By Separating End-User Machines from Legitimate Mail Server Machines] (2011, PDF)