Sender Policy Framework

<Julian>    1. I suggest we choose an official name for the council, other than 
            "SPF Leadership Council". As I have already explained on #spf a few
            days ago, I think the term "leadership" in "leadership council" has
            negative connotations in some parts of the world, especially where
            I live.
<csm>       okay...
<csm>       is there an alternative suggestion for this bodies official name?
* Julian proposes "SPF Project Council" or "SPF Steering Council".
<Julian>    (But better proposals are welcome.)
* csm prefers (of those two alternatives) the 2nd one
* grumpy could live with either, but likes the second one better
<freeside>  how about "SPF Council"
* MarkK prefers the second one too
<csm>       what about freeside's suggestion?
<csm>       frankly I think I like it even better
* grumpy could live with "SPF council" also, but slightly prefers "SPF Steering
  Council"
<Julian>    I'd prefer "SPF Project Council" over "SPF Council", but I think
            "SPF Steering Council" is even better.
<csm>       do I hear a motion?
<grumpy>    does anyone *dislike* any of the proposed alternatives?
<csm>       I do not like "Project"
<Julian>    csm: You may be right.
<csm>       it minimizes what we are about
<MarkK>     'project' has the ring of temporariness to it
<grumpy>    anyone else have comments?
<Julian>    We can always rename the council to "AMSG Steering (or whatever)
            Council" later.
<csm>       Steering is okay but I think the non-descript "SPF Council" is even
            better
<csm>       no limits fore or aft
* grumpy decides that shorter is better and switches to "SPF Council"
<Julian>    I could live with "SPF Council". I guess I'll just have to get used
            to it. :)
<csm>       okay...
<Julian>    I formally propose to name the council "SPF Council".
<csm>       freeside make your motion
<csm>       ah
<csm>       the chair hears a motion
<Julian>    (Clipboard rules.)
<csm>       do we have a second?
<grumpy>    seconded
<csm>       okay
<csm>       votes
<Julian>    2019u: yes
<grumpy>    2019u: yes
<MarkK>     2019u yes
<grumpy>    freeside: ?
<csm>       so ordered... (it was freesides choice)